दुनिया या इंडिया का कोई भी बच्चा धर्म या जात लेकर पैदा नहीं होता; उसको धर्म और जात में समाजमें बसे बिचारधारा बाँटता है; बिचारधारा केवल इंसान से ही पैदा हुआ है किसी भगवानसे नहीं; और उस बिचार को अपने दिमाग में पालने वाले लोग अपने ही होते हैं. जो बिचार धारा गन्दा, बुरा और बिकृत है उस बिचारधारा को पालनेसे समाज बुरा, बिकृत और गन्दा ही होगा. अगर समाज को गन्दा, बुरा और बिकृत बिचार से बचाना है तो गन्दा, बुरा और बिकृत मन और बिचार की सफाई जरूरी है. एक बुरे, गंदे और बिकृत बिचारधारासे ग्रसित इंसान को मार देने से बुरे, गंदे और बिकृत बिचारधारा नहीं मरता; बस एक इंसान मरता है. कोई भी इंसान एक इंसान के चहरे से ये कभी भी पता नहीं कर सकता उसके दिमाग में क्या है और किस किस के दिमाग में वह बुरे, गंदे और बिकृत बिचार पल रहा है; इसलिए बुरे, गंदे और बिकृत बिचारधारा को बस बिचार से ही मारा जा सकता है. बिचारधारा की लड़ाई में कोई भी बिचारधारा को जो लोग जबरदस्ती थोपते हैं या अपने बिचार को थोपनेकेलिए लोगोंका उत्पीड़िन और उनकी शोषण करते हैं या उनकी जान भी ले लेते हैं वह दरअसल असामाजिक बिकृत लोग ही हैं. इंडिया में पैदा हर बच्चा पैदा होनेसे पहले ही ये तय करलिया जाता है की वह कौनसा बिचारधारा को अपनाएगा, यानि किस बिचारधारा की गुलाम बनेगा और वह जब दुनिया को समझनेकी कोशिस करने की कोशिस करता हि होता है की उसके दिमाग में धार्मिक बिचारधारा भरना सुर करके उसको बिचारधाराओं के आधार पर बांटा जाता है; उसको ये बताया जाता है की तेरी बिचारधरा ये है; तू इस बिचारधाराकी भीड़ का एक हिस्सा है और तू उनसे अलग है यानि इंडिया का हर बच्चा पैदा होने का कुछ ही दिन के बाद एक एक बिचारधारका गुलाम बना दियाजाता है और इंसान को इंसान से बिचारधाराओंके आधारपर अलग करदिया जाता है जो की एक मानसिक बिकृति है. मानसिक बिकृति से मानसिक और सामाजिक बुराइयां पैदा नहीं होगी तो क्या अच्छाइयां पैदा होगी? स्वाधीन बिचार इंसान की प्राकृतिक अधिकार है, इस अधिकार को छिनने वाला या मन को भगवान के नामपर गुलाम बनाने वाला हर बिचार एक तरह की बिकृति है. कुछ असामाजिक धूर्त्त बिचारवाले ब्यक्ति और उनके पूर्बजोंने निजी और सांगठनिक स्वार्थ केलिए खुद की और उनकी बिचार के अनुयायिओं के मन और बिचार को बुरे, गंदे और बिकृत बिचारधारासे भरदिया है जिसको वह अपना परंपरा, प्रथा, संस्कृति और अपने सामाजिक उत्पत्तिके सूत्र मानते हैं जो की मानसिक रूप से नशीला मीठी झूठ है. जो धूर्त्त इंसान, बातें और शरीरसे आकर्षक है ये जरूरी नहीं है की वह सच्चा और बिचार से ज्ञानी है. यही कारण है की बैदक धर्म फैलानेवाले अपने निजी और सांगठनिक स्वार्थ केलिए; झूठी दिखावासे न केवल अपने पीढ़ीओं को बिकृत बनाया बदले में धर्म के नामपर अपना हर अनुयायिओं और उनके पीढ़ीओं को भी बिकृत बनाया. असामाजिक धूर्त्त बिचार वाले ब्यक्ति अपने बुरे, गंदे और बिकृत बिचार फ़ैलाने केलिए इंडियन भूखंड में पैदा कई अच्छी बिचार की सफाई करके अपने गन्दी बिचारधारा भर दी है जिसकी सफाई होना जरूरी है. किसी भी बिचारधारा को जबरदस्ती थोपना या छल और बल से लोगों के ऊपर लागु करना एक तरह की मानबता या इंसान की बच्चे के ऊपर जुल्म है. ये जरुरी नहीं के भगवान के नाम पर बने कोई भी बिचारधारा को सही मानलिया जाए क्यों के ये भगवान के नाम पर बनाया गया बिचारधारा है. कोईभी बिचारधरा जो इंसान के जिंदगी और सोच केलिए खतरनाक हो वह किसीके भी नामपर बने हो उसको नकारना चाहिए. ज्यादातर भगवान के नाम पर बनाये गए बिचारधारा जिसको लोग धर्म कहते हैं ज्यादातर झूट, धोखा, छल, कपट, वंचना, ढकोसला, धूर्तता, चालाकी, भ्रम, भेदभाव, असामंजस्यता, अज्ञानता, अंध विश्वास, हिंसा और कई तरह की सामाजिक बुराई से बने हैं और इन सबको धर्म के आड़ में कुछ धूर्त्त अपने और अपने सांगठनिक फ़ायदा केलिए फैलाते हैं. इनलोगोंने अपने अनुयायों के मनको बैचारिक नशे में रखने केलिए कई तरह की उत्सब बनाये हुए है यानि एक एक तरह की मनोरंजन से जोड़े हुए हैं ताकि उनकी ध्यान उनकी धूर्त्तता के खोज ना करे. संगीत, सोच और लेखन रचनाएँ, बड़े बड़े मूर्त्ति और स्थापत्य इत्यादि इत्यादि का सहारा उनकी बिचार को थोपने या फ़ैलाने केलिए इस्तेमाल होते हैं. बिचारधारा कोईभी हो उसको परखनेकी और अपने पसंदसे अपनाने का आजादी होना चाहिए. गलत, गन्दा या बुरा बिचारधारा की बिरोध करनेका भी आज़ादी होना चाहिए ताकि भगवान के आड़ में या उसकी नामको लेकर कोई गलत इस्तेमाल न करसके. कोई किसीको अपने बिचारधारा की गुलाम बनाये उसकी भी आज़ादी नहीं होना चाहिए. जो लोग परिधान और चेहरा का संकेत (Dress & Facial codes) जैसा टिका और टोपी जैसे फैशन का इस्तेमाल करते हैं वह ये कहना चाहते हैं की उनके बिचारधरा अलग है और वह एक एक बिचारधारा की गुलाम है और उसकी प्रमोसन इस माध्यम से करते रहेंगे जो एक बेवकूफी है. इंसान को इंसान की बच्चे ही रहने दें कोई बिचार का गुलाम न बनायें. इंसान की बच्चे को अच्छी और बुरे बिचार के ज्ञान दें और हमेशा अच्छी बिचार का अनुयाई बनने की संस्कार दें यही है इंसानी धर्म या इंसानियत. अच्छे बिचार की फॉलोअर या अनुयाइ बनें ना कि किसी धर्म की. अच्छे बिचारों को किसी भी धर्म में लोगोंने ब्रांडिंग की हो उस बिचारको फलो करने केलिए उसकी धर्म को अपनाना जरुरी नहीं है क्यों के उस बिचार को एक इंसान ने बनाया है और अलगाओबादने उसको ब्रांडिंग की है.
Disclaimer: This blog exposes who are really Muslims of British India i.e. Muslims from India, Pakistan and Bangladesh those populates more than 52Crores in Asian continent and what are their contribution to their Nation. It can hurt to approximate 52Crores Muslims out of 170crores population of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh those are majorly ignorant about their ancestors and their evil contributions to their Nations for which their Nation stagnated till to date. This website does not claim all Muslims are having evil ideology but being a part of the evil race knowing their persecution to others is severely bad, is also one kind of sleeping support to that evilness or racial crimes. Knowing to their evil contribution to their Nation and not having any try for reformation shows negligence of supporting crimes by the liberal Muslims. More than 99% Muslims may even don’t know why they are Muslims, so whatever they did they were told or commanded by their authorities to do so; In this case they are abettors of racial crimes due to their authorities, those passed the evil information with the miscarriage of guidance to exploit others according to their wish. So evil Muslims authorities those passed to their descendants knowing its bad to others or to their Nations is prime accused and the website name them as crook Muslims. The hate speech laws aim to prevent discord among its many ethnic and religious communities. The laws allow a citizen to seek the punishment of anyone who shows the citizen disrespect “on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, caste or community or any other ground whatsoever”. The laws specifically forbid anyone from outraging someone’s “religious feelings”. This is the reason why constitution of these Nations even indirectly give permissions to promote and support antisocial activities done by the cunning religious races and itself religions in the name of hate speech bans. Saying truth and claiming justice against antisocial activities by religious communes are not crimes; so saying truth if someone’s “religious feelings” is outraged they must have to proof the truth claimed is false otherwise they are accused of promoting religious crimes. Contents of this website should not be taken or subjected or constitute or construed as abusive, enticing or promoting hate or violence against any particular race, nationality, religion or lifestyle; illegal, threatening, harassing, annoying or disrupting, hateful, defamatory, libelous, slanderous, scandalous or injurious to the reputation of any person or entity, and only be constitute or construed as facts of knowledge which need to be discussed for mankind to decline harm full believe structure of Human-beings. Nature has given humanity the ability to think, to evaluate, to imagine, to compare and contrast and then come to conclusions based upon knowledge. This is what differentiates the faculties of human beings from the other members of the Animal Kingdom. The motive of this website is for establishing our global and National peace, unite humanity, strengthening the securities and establishing peaceful life. Website is against the irrationalities in religions and races. Strictly mentioned don’t read if you don’t like; nobody (writer or it’s promoters) will be responsible if it hurts to your existing beliefs or any conflicts in any forms due to this website though your state laws may enforces it as offenses. Reading this website means you are aware about the disclaimer of the website and bound to accept and agreed; that, you will not misuse the information in any means and in any forms. The information in this website will be only taken as the knowledge for discussion and interpretation for the eradication of irrationality in Human belief system that arises due to God beliefs in different parts of the world; So solely take this website at your own risk. Readers are requested to have the intellectual inquisitiveness, to persevere, to continue reading and investigating.
Islam in Indian pre-partition Demography.
There is no God but God.
Islam: Enemy of logical thinking and interpretation / Science and reasons. Islam strictly prohibits freedom of thinking and reasoning even speaking which is violation of human rights.
Islam religion is called as religion of peace, but Violence is legalized through their morals. It declines idolism and promotes monotheism but followers pray to vacuum/space/emptiness/air that has no shape and size which are even entities. All Muslims in the world bows toward to Mecca in which a squared size structure is placed named Kaaba as an entity to Islam; where before Islamization to that place i.e. in 630AD, there were 360 deities worshiped by preIslamic ancient Arabians. Originally Arabic pagans were idol worshiper till it had declined by prophet Muhammad; destroying to that structure and forcefully, by shine of sword and terror of death implemented Islam in his own native place. He had massacred to his own root natives to implement his made religion i.e. Islam and this facts are never told to Islamic followers. Inside Kaaba you can find three pillars, some utensils hanged to a rod that is attached to these three pillars, one solid table and with some Arabic written posters on the wall. If idol worshiping is declined then bowing to these things meant what? is out of logic. Praying a mind born identity that does not exists or exists psychologically only in their followers brain is nothing but a psychological disorder. Allah identity was there in Arabic race with other form; but prophet Muhammad used the identity and redefined it as formless as his own psychological construct and propagated as his God. Islam had invented by Prophet Muhammad in his forties i.e. in 610AD when he was meditating in a cave mount Heera. It is prominently mentioned angel Gabriel was the mental communicator who gave knowledge of Allah and Islam to Muhammad. Prophet Muhammad was a servant to Khadijah, whom he married at the age of 25 when she was 40 and his prime profession was as a trader till his forties not as a saint till he got the knowledge of Islam. You can’t find any saintly activities before his forties. What is the authenticity of angel Gabriel? Why he communicated to only Muhammad and not to followers of 360 idol worshipers in Kabba? Before his forties he was either an idol worshiper or non-religious which directly proves he was not a Muslim for forty years. Why should we believe what he saw in his dream or in his thought and felt the same? If a man dreamed about a nude girl fucked by him in his dream; would it mandatory to whom he passes the dreamed acts should be fucked by the listener in the same way to that same girl as he did? What should we call it? Is not it a directly a stupidity and a mental disorder? Enforcing someones believe or faith to any other brain is simply brain rape. What he thought; it was his private concerns. It was schizophrenic or delusion is not the matter; but his mind born process or identity or philosophy should mandatory be followed by his followers definitely a mental disorder and it does matters. He was a Kafir according to his own teachings; when he had not invented Islam i.e. he was a Kafir for forty years and rest 22 years as a Muslim. He had destroyed 360 Idols of Kaaba means he had rejected or disbelieved to idol deities of Arab which is even called as infidel. Its the Muhammad’s invented religion that victimized humans as his followers naming them as Muslims by only the shine of sword or terror of death and privileged right to life and fair justice to those followers or social groups those embraced his political faith system; but in truth followers had been exploited mentally and psychologically for years rather than having a better life. Arab was never been a land of Islam before 610AD. Muhammad created his own faith system and his own crowd of Islam as the crowd spread and became bigger now it has 1.8 billion adherents, making up about 24% of the world population. Those are not belongs to Arabic linguistic race i.e. if their mother tongue is different from Arabic language those race don’t have any relation to Islam except an adoption of set of beliefs named Islam. Once converted or embraced to the religion, there is no escape from the religion. Escaping from religion even can cause follower’s death; so its a trap of spirituality or set of instructions made by Muhammad that is run by his orthodox mentally biased or disordered spiritual leaders. Followers are polarized five times daily through prayers/salat practices. Psychologically public addressing systems are used to polarize, unite and radicalize to whole commune by adhan. Followers are trained and psychologically tuned like animals (like even a parrot) that your are Muslims through 5 times adhan per day. Followers are brain washed daily by these verses:
God is Great
(said four times)
Ashhadu an la ilaha illa Allah
I bear witness that there is no god except the One God.
(said two times)
Ashadu anna Muhammadan Rasool Allah
I bear witness that Muhammad is the messenger of God.
(said two times)
Hurry to the prayer (Rise up for prayer)
(said two times)
Hurry to success (Rise up for Salvation)
(said two times)
God is Great
[said two times]
La ilaha illa Allah
There is no god except the One God
Followers of Islam not allowed to explore and investigate authenticity of Religion and God Allah. There is no freedom for logical thinking, interpretation and reasoning against Islamic religion; if it is tried then severe persecution and exploitation would cause to such kind of activities of followers which can lead to death sentence.
Billions of Islamic followers feel proud to visit Kaaba, but what inside Kaaba? Is it really worth a pride?
If idol worship or any kind of identity with shape and size is denied by Islam; then bowing to Kaaba i.e bowing to three pillars and some hanging utensils inside the Kaaba makes what sense? Bowing to Three pillars and some hanging utensils in the name of Allah is great stupidity or great divinity? or its just Stupidity legalized by faith system.
More than 99.99% Muslims of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh doesn’t know about their origin. Most of them thinks they are belongs to out of their countries because Islam is a foreign religion; where truth is more than 97% Muslims of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh are root natives to their own land and their linguistic races; where only 3% or even less than 3% Muslims are from other origins, but not majorly from Arabic origin. Islamic Invaders those invaded India like Arabians, Persians, Afghans and Turko-mongols once upon a time had practicing some other faiths before conversion to Islam and Invading to Indian Demography. Islamic invasion majorly happened in 700AD its because Prophet Muhammad born in 570AD and reveled his faith Islam in his forties i.e. in 609/610AD and got died in 632AD, so after 610AD his followers embraced the Islam and propagated to other land. When Islam came to our Indian demography in that time Brahmanism was the major religion, because Buddhism and other major faiths like Ajivika, Vaishesika, Charuvaka/Lokayata etc. etc. had been destroyed by Vedic promoters after 185 BC and after wards. Many kingdoms had been converted to Vedic caste systems its the reason why major population from different linguistic Kingdoms had converted to Shudra castes those had been exploited by Vedic upper castes due to their Brahmin’s code of Manusmriti. Brahmins was not from any other race as many historians thinks like they were Arayans or from the Iran etc. Brahmins were our crook root natives of different linguistic clans leaded by Vedic cons those worked as organized to dominate all civilization as their slaves. If Brahmins were Aryans then what were their Kshatriyas, Vaishyas and Shudras those have different mother tongues and surnames changing with the demography in India? If Arayans were outsiders then what were these Kshatriyas, Vaishyas and Shudras? The language and surnames of these castes even changes with changing demographic regions. Should we say them even outsiders or root-natives of Indian demography? Indian demography was a place of thousands of kingdoms those had their own kind of governance and art of livings; but implementation of Vedic caste system to those kingdoms made Kings as Kshatriyas, Priests as Brahmins, traders as Vaishyas and working class as slaves naming them Shudra. If we will define it in other terms Vedic Social system made the societies, knave or धूर्त as Brahmins, blusterer or दबंग as Kshatriyas, dishonest traders or ठग as Vaishyas, and working class or slaves or गुलाम as Shudra. धूर्त, दबंग, ठग collectively known as upper castes or ruling castes those made working class as गुलाम or lower caste. Only Vedic Purusha Sukta privileged and uplifted criminals of different linguistic races with their so called Vedic upper caste certifications to give them a noble social status in their Vedic society. Vedic society or Caste system or Varna system is the dirty and idiotic social management system ever made in this demography by only cons or crooks of this land that has been devastating & stagnating Indian civilization till to date. Every patriotic Indian must decline this stupid Vedic social system identities. To be an Indian its not necessary to be certified by a Vedic social recognition or by their caste system certificates as Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaishya and Shudra. Kings were there in other Nations or other civilizations but they are not called as Kshatriyas. Kings from other religions are not called as Kshatriyas; Even in our Indian mythologies Rakhasha or devil kings were not called as Ksatriyas. Ksahtriya is a certification of Brahmins or Vedic promoters to Kings. In Indian civilization many kings had declined Vedism/Brahmanisms but their promoters representing them according to their caste based certification till to date and their supporter writers and historians using their certification in many places to promote Purusha Sukta in present civilization. For an example Mauryans never ever believed in Vedic based caste systems but now Vedic follower writers promoting them as Kshatirya to promote their hegemony. Why a King should need a Vedic Kshatirya certification from Brahmins or Vedic promoters? Is not it sufficient a King should be called as only a King or emperor? We can find priest class in other religions but they are not called Brahmins. Even in our Indian civilization priest/spiritual teachers of Ajivika, Vaisheshika, Sankhya, Yoga, Charuvaka, Buddhist, Jains, Sikhs etc. are not called Brahmins. We can find many people doing business/trade professions in other civilizations or in other religions but they are not called as Vaishyas. Working class other than Vedic Varna/caste system implemented societies never ever called as Shudras. So Brahman, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas and Shudras nomenclature and restriction of professions to these specific class of people branding them with these names and implementing a surname to their names for prohibiting varna/class/profession interchange is just a social system made by only con and stupid Vedic promoters with an evil intention to rule & dominate the Indian civilization making preferred professions reserved to only their descendants as race. It is not mandatory an Indian should have a social identity according to Vedic certification of Purusha Sukta or caste system. Caste system had organized only धूर्त, दबंग, ठग as ruling class or upper castes and Shudras or working class or श्रमिक वर्ग/मज़दूर वर्ग/गुलाम वर्ग as lower castes. If a person should be recognized as per the Vedic social representations then it should be transparent or nude to their characteristic they represent. In that way if a person’s name is Jawaharlal Nehru and don’t represent its vedic social identity, then its ok. If it represents Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru better to say it Jawaharlal धूर्त. If Baldev Singh represents to Kshatriya caste, it can be represented as Baldev दबंग, like that if Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi represents to Vaishya caste, it can be said as Mohandas Karamchand ठग and representing to Shudra like B. R. Ambedkar as B. R. श्रमिक/मज़दूर/गुलाम. Either we should represent the real identities of Purusha Sukta or we should abolish the stupid Purusha sukta social certifications and adopt universal representations according to their skills and professions without any involvement of any Vedic certified hereditary caste based nomenclature of social identity that creates disharmony and discrimination. Due to Vedic classification huge population of working class root-natives fall in Shudra castes and exploited by upper caste of Vedic society. When Islam came to Indian demography they forcefully converted many root natives to Islam irrespective what they were practicing in that time. When Shudra got a better faith than even Vedism/Brahmanism many lower castes even converted themselves in to Islam; it does not mean Brahmans, Viashyas and Kshatriyas had not converted in that time. Islamic Invaders amalgamated to root natives of India and lost their origin identity but their embraced art of living style i.e. Islam became a major part of Indian race. Here everybody must remember that the founder of Islam Prophet Muhammad was a non Muslim or polytheist believer till his forties i.e. he lived as a non Muslim for 40 years and rest 22 years as Muslim. Anybody can study what he did in his 40 years and rest 22 years. His non-Muslim life was more better than his rest 22 years life as he lived as an identity of violence and sins. Non of his parents and even his uncle Abū Ṭālib ibn ‘Abd al-Muṭṭalib was Muslims. When his faith Islam came to India our root natives embraced the faith only due to Vedic persecution of caste system by Vedic adopted upper castes. Many root natives like Brahmins Ksatiryas and Vasihyas even had converted to Muslims due to different privileges or benefits found in Islam which absent in Indian based faiths. Many even had converted due to marry many wives and some not to migrate other parts of India leaving their properties and lands etc. so on and so forth. So the Muslims we see in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh majorly our root natives those had converted to Islam due to majorly faiths persecutions. Muslims of different states are only the root natives of that State or linguistic race i.e. Muslims seen in Gujarat are belongs to Gujarati linguistic clans those had converted to Islam after 700AD. Like this the Muslims seen in our different states are originally belongs to that States or linguistic race excluding interstates migrations. Andra Muslims are from Telugu linguist clans, Maharashtra Muslims are belongs to Marathi linguist clan, so on and so forth. They changed their mother tongues as Urdu due to maintaining uniformity of community in Indian Muslims. Urdu is an Indian language whose 99% verbs are from Nagari language. Nagari language or “Language of City or Nagar” was the popular language in medieval India. Due to fabrication of Brahmins it is renamed with a prefix Dev/Deb to it; so it renamed as Debnagari/Devnagari. When Islamic emperor came to this Indian demography and ruled many Indian kingdoms they renamed the major popular language as Hindi because they had departed non-Muslims with an identity as Hindu; therefore till to date Muslims of Indian origin including Pakistan, India and Bangladesh they don’t recognize themselves as Hindu. Major Vedic promoters those promote Hindu as the communal identity of 82% population of India those are not belongs to Islam and Christian etc. even not read their scriptures perfectly. There is no word exists “Hindu” in any religious scriptures i.e. in Vedas, Puranas, Buddhist and Jain scriptures etc. etc. developed in India even till to 1500AD. Nagari alias Devnagari/Debnagari or Hindi has origin to Pali language not to Sanskrit. When Buddhism was the major faith of Mauryans and successive Buddhist empires it was a popular language of the demography. Still in India more than 41% peoples recognize themselves Hindi or Nagari as their mother tongue. In commonsense “place(Sthan) of Hindi spoken people is know as Hindustan.” Majorly Indian and Pakistani Muslims those use their most favorable second language other than Urdu, is their original mother tongue which represents their real ethnic group or linguistic race. Every individual linguistic clan and their demographics represents to that root natives clan or to their ancestral habitats they belongs to; So those have Urdu as their first language or second language as any Indian language has no connection with Arabic land or Arabic race in any kind without adoption of Islam by their ancestors after 700AD. Muslims of different States of India were root natives to their land its the reason why they could not leave their root native land even after partition its because they didn’t have any relatives out of their root native place, but evil dirty politicians forced them to leave their own land due to their dirty political hegemony. When British wanted to leave India then power hunger root natives political parties wanted to dominate the population according to their majority of faith following. Pre-Partition India had divided according to political parties with their faith. Its the reason why India got divided due to these political parties for their organized benefits without caring the consent of the root natives. When India got divided majorly Punjabi, Gujarati, Rajasthani and Kashmiri descent root natives those had converted to Islam populated the Pakistan. If we see population of Muslims in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh then anybody can guess which majority linguistic clan that dominates the land. 19crores of Muslims in India descents from different linguistic clans of India. Bangladeshi hold 86.6% as Islam from its whole population where 98% of the population from only Bengali spoken language clan. Arabian don’t speaks in Bengali language so a kid can understand Bengali spoken people had converted to Islam when Islam came to Indian demography. Pakistan has the population exceeding 207.77 million people. from which 96.4% follow Islam. If we will go through their ethnic groups then 44.68% belongs to Punjabis, 15.42% Pashtuns, 14.1% Sindhis, 8.38% Saraikis, 7.57% Muhajirs, 3.57% Balochis and 6.28% Others. So Punjabi clan converted Muslims dominate Pakistan though spiritual father of Pakistan i.e. Muhammad Iqbal was from Kashmir Pandit descent and founder of Pakistan Muhammad Ali Jinnah was from Gujarati Baniya descent whose ancestors had converted to Shia sect of Islam. The other name of India is Hindustan. When Islamic invaders ruled the Indian demography they named the demography according to riverside dwellers named Sindhu. Actually Sindhu means river its not a name but it is used as Name. The clan who were living on the river side Shindu/Shindhu/Shindu/Sindu they are well know as Sindhi and even the demography well known as Sindh/Sind with little variation. Though India had many kingdoms but Islamic emperors only had coined the word Hindu dropping “s” from Shindu to identify the whole root-natives of Indian demography. Though Sindu word found in Rig. Veda but in any Indian scriptures we can’t find the word “Hindu” shows Hindu word has no connection with other linguistic kingdoms of India except Sindh regions. Hindu word or identity is not a construct by root natives of Indian demographic regions. This word or identity is construct by Persian, Afghani and Arabic root native peoples to the people those were living on the banks of river Shindu. When Islamic Invaders came to this demography about 700ADmany of them established their kingdoms and named their kingdom according to this people those were living on the bank of Shindu for which we get name of kingdoms like Al-Hind, Indoustan or Hindustan. It does not mean people were not living in other parts of the demography or regions except Shindu people; since in ancient time there was no single kingdom or single linguistic race; many linguistic races and kingdoms were there in that time frame which has no connection of any kind except a neighboring demography. When Islam came to Indian demography many root natives converted to Islam by their shine of sword and some converted to Islam due to Vedic caste system or persecution to lower caste by upper castes. It does not mean other root natives had not converted to Islam without these two main reasons. Conversion to Islam had various reasons. Due to major Islamic conversion; Islamic emperors used the word Hindu to non-Muslim root natives of Indian demography so other than Muslims of Indian demography got identity Hindu by only Islamic emperors. We can’t find their Kingdoms as Al-Hind, Indostan/Indoustan, Hindustan etc. in any religious scripture including Buddhist scriptures that had composed in Indian demography. Though Hindu streams from this river Sindhu/Indus/Indu and their dwellers Sindhi clan there was no relation of any kind to other parts of the Indian demography relating to Shindi clan. Europeans had given the name Indus, Indu and India which even streams from the name Shindu. Veda is composed by Sanskrit language and Sindhi language has no similarity with Sanskrit so Sindhi spoken people has no connection with Sanskrit language; which proves Sindhu civilization and Vedic civilization were different civilizations and they don’t have any connection to each other. All Vedas are directly not understood by Sindhi peoples and Veda is not written in Sindhi language shows Shindhu civilization is not Vedic civilization. Shindhu people were not even Hindu in their age of regime. Many clans had no religions at all except their tribal beliefs. When this area ruled by Mauryan empire king Ashoka in 263BC may be their root natives had embraced to Buddhist religion. When Pushyamitra Shunga destroyed Buddhism and implemented caste system in 185BC it may converted to vedic caste based administration system. When Islam invaders came in 700AD most of them converted to Islam and after 1947 Sindhi spoken clan divided according to their embraced religions. More than 2.2 Crore Sindhi lives in Pakistan and 99% of them are Muslims where only about 38 Lakhs lives in India and most of them are following Brahmanism/Vedism/Hinduism. Here I discussed about Sindhus because those gave the identity to more than 100 corers of people of India as Hindu; now majorly Muslims and those have been identified as Hindu they don’t have any connection to Shindhu civilization. The pity thing is the ancestors of this clan neither was Hindu nor Muslims in their age of regime. Both Shindu river and Shindu civilization better know as Shind province of Pakistan after partition resides in Pakistan; therefore original Hindustan is Pakistan not India. Stupid politicians were so logical blind that they overlooked which essential demography should be in which part according to their origin after partition. Like this Afghan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa was the belt of Buddhism; when even Ghazni arrived in the region Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Buddhism was the prominent religion.
When Punjab demography divided in partition, then Pakistan‘s Punjab became second largest province by area, after Balochistan, and it became the most populous province, with an estimated population of 110.012,442 million as of 2017, where population of Balochistan is only 12.34 million even being the largest province. Major ethnic group of Punjabi dominates Pakistan without any doubts. India’s Punjab has 50,362 km² with only 27.98 million population where Pakistan’s Punjab has the 205,344 km² with 110.012,442 million population. When we got partition then root-natives of Punjab those had their lands in partitioned Punjab in Pakistan had never ever wanted to leave their land so they must have been converted to Islam for their ancestral property; So apart from root natives those had converted to Islam from Rajasthan, Gujarat and Kashmir which are now neighbor to Pakistan must have forced to migrate from India to Pakistan but they were less than Punjabi linguistic clan.
Muhammad Ali Jinnah was from Gujrati linguistic race those once upon a time following Vedic caste system and polytheist idolism. Just like the rest of the Muslims from Indian origin, he too was a decedent of a Hindu. His paternal grandfather was Premjibhai Meghji Thakkar. Premjibhai Meghji Thakkar was a Lohana from Paneli village in Gondal state in Kathiawar in Gujrat. He had made his fortune in the fish business, but he was ostracized from his vegetarian Lohana caste because of their strong religious beliefs. When he discontinued his fish business and tried to come back to his caste, he was not allowed to do so because of the huge egos of the self-proclaimed protectors of Hindu religion. Resultant, his son, Punjalal Thakkar (the father of Jinnah), was so angry with the humiliation that he changed his and his four sons’ religion, and converted to Islam. Jinnah’s father Poonjabhai Jinno was a first generation Muslim. He was a believer of Khoja Shia sect of Islam.
You must also know Muhammad Iqbal or Sir Muhammad Iqbal aka Allama Iqbal who inspired the Pakistan Movement and is called the “Spiritual Father of Pakistan” was a Hindu Brahmin from Sapru clan. His grand father’s name was Rattan Lal Sapru who was without any doubt from Sapru clan.
Apart form division due to Majority(Hindu) Vs. Second Majority (Islam), some people believes there was even a tingle love story of Jinah and Nehru with Edwina Mountbatten for which India got divided.
HOW FAITH AND DIRTY POLITICS DEVASTATED TO KASHMIR.
Every root natives of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh must know how their ancestors faith changed due to diversification of civilizations with the different time frames. Every Hindu must know why they are Hindus and Muslims of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh should know why they are Muslims and how they became Muslims.
“Divide and destroy” & “Divide and rule” are the prime weapons of Brahmanism. Racially Brahmins were never ever good in any skilled work without cheating & exploiting in the name of God and religion. They renamed others great work in their favor & in their name to promote their race. Brahmanism is nothing but con/knave/cunning people of every linguistic clans of India worked as organized those had promoted Vedic Purusha sukta certifying themselves as Brahmins i.e. number one social elites of caste based social system and preserved the King profession and traders profession for their created social class Kshatriyas and Vaishyas declining these professions to poor root natives. They are only the masters of cheating and all kind of social evils; altogether a race of crooks. They promoted illiteracy, ignorance, deceptions, delusions, blind beliefs, disharmony and discrimination etc. etc. to their followers so that they can be victimized ever and ever. They are actually stupid criminals those acts as parasites in the Indian societies and lives as jackal/fox and feed themselves by cheating to their followers in the name of religion & God. These days they know their demerits its the reason why they started to adopt those professions, by which they can control their followers and others. They have been trapped the governance in its all perspectives. They have been trapped almost more than 50% positions in executives, legislative and judiciary including fourth pillar of democracy i.e. mainstream Medias. They have been privileged many so called uplifted Shudras certifying them as Kshatriya those are populating positions in Indian Army so that they can be used as their force. No Kings or Kings descendants are there those populates our Army as Kings/Kshatriyas. Kshatriya are only Kings not soldiers. They started to upper caste hunger uplifted Shudras as Kshatriya so that they can be used as their slaved armed force. You can find even people those are so poor that they even don’t get three times meals in a day and says themselves as Kshatriya. Is a King or descent of a King had that so poor circumstances? How many Kings and their family members are there in India? Social so called Kshatriya proud themselves as Kshatriya though they don’t have no Kshetra i.e. land or Kingdoms and even any wealth without the surnames of Kshatriyas.
In many civilization classes are there i.e. rich and poor classes, but you can’t find any Varna system/Castes anywhere in the world except India. Brahmins stabilized or frozen the professions as Varna class that declined to others and even to each other Varnas. If you are poor then there is possibility of being rich but crook Brahmins frozen the professional classes naming it as varnas/castes and banned their preferred professions to others and made it hereditary to the racial Varnas with surnames. Stupid Brhmin’s son becomes “Pandit” with his birth. He got certificate of Pandit from his mother’s womb. His mother’s womb is his university of knowledge that gives certificate of Pandit/Scholar without any studies and examinations. Brahmin’s programmed Purusha Shukta with that evil intentions, that made Priest, King and traders profession stabilized or frozen so that poor classes can’t be the competitor to them. The great mass of Buddhist population even got certified as Shudra those don’t had priest, King and traders profession at the time of Purusha shukta implementation to different linguistic clans after 185BC. They banned education, right to equality, property, right to dignity, equal opportunity, fair life, fair and equal livelihood & justice etc. to Shudras by enforcing Brahmin’s code of Manusmriti; so that they can make them slaves for ever for which they can’t be rebellion to them in any circumstances and can’t be problem to their racial hegemony and organized benefits.
There is no definition of Hinduism in our any religious scriptures and even in our any laws though Article 25 (2)(b) of constitution and section 2 of Hindu marriage Act. 1955 recognize who are Hindus.
India’s Constitution does not give a definition of the term Hindu, but it does define to whom the Hindu Law applies. It has to do this because in spite of its pretence to secularism, the Indian Constitution allows Muslims, Christians and Parsis a separate Personal Law. In a way, this separate treatment of different communities merely continues the communal autonomy of castes and sects accepted in pre-modern Hindu states, but it exposes the credibility deficit of Indian secularism. At any rate, the situation is that Personal Law is divided on the basis of religion, and that one of the legal subsystems is called Hindu Law.
Article 25 (2)(b) of the Constitution stipulates that the reference to Hindus shall be construed as including a reference to persons professing the Sikh, Jain or Buddhist religion. The Hindu Marriage Act of 1955 goes in greater detail to define this legal Hindu, by stipulating in Section 2 that the Act applies:
Section 2 in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
2 Application of Act.
(1) This Act applies
(a) to any person who is a Hindu by religion in any of its forms or developments, including a Virashaiva, a Lingayat or a follower of the Brahmo, Prarthana or Arya Samaj,
(b) to any person who is a Buddhist, Jaina or Sikh by religion, and
(c) to any other person domiciled in the territories to which this Act extends who is not a Muslim, Christian, Parsi or Jew by religion, unless it is proved that any such person would not have been governed by the Hindu law or by any custom or usage as part of that law in respect of any of the matters dealt with herein if this Act had not been passed.
Explanation. The following persons are Hindus, Buddhists, Jainas or Sikhs by religion, as the case may be:
(a) any child, legitimate or illegitimate, both of whose parents are Hindus, Buddhists, Jainas or Sikhs by religion;
(b) any child, legitimate or illegitimate, one of whose parents is a Hindu, Buddhist, Jaina or Sikh by religion and who is brought up as a member of the tribe, community, group or family to which such parent belongs or belonged; and
(c) any person who is a convert or re-convert to the Hindu, Buddhist, Jaina or Sikh religion.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), nothing contained in this Act shall apply to the members of any Scheduled Tribe within the meaning of clause (25) of Article 366 of the Constitution unless the Central Government, by notification in the Official Gazette, otherwise directs.
(3) The expression Hindu in any portion of this Act shall be construed as if it included a person who, though not a Hindu by religion, is, nevertheless, a person to whom this Act applies by virtue of the provisions contained in this section. State Amendment Pondicherry: In section 2, insert the following sub-section:(2A) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), nothing contained in this Act shall apply to the Renoncants of the Union territory of Pondicherry . [ Vide Regn. 7 of 1963, sec. 2 and Sch. (w.e.f. 1-10-1963).]
This definition of the legal Hindu, though explicitly not equating him with the Hindu by religion, is exactly coterminous with the original Islamic use of the term Hindu: all Indian Pagans are legally Hindus. The Buddhists, Jains and Sikhs are explicitly included in the Hindus by law but separated from the Hindus by religion: at this point, the law follows the usage established by Western scholars, contrary to the original usage.
Note that the changes in Hindu Law imposed by an Act of Parliament (on top of the very existence of separate Hindu and Muslim Law regimes) constitute a further measure of communal inequality. The secular government would not dare to touch the other religion-based law systems, as has repeatedly been shown in the past decades regarding items of Christian and Muslim Personal Law. An interference in Hindu Law by a national legislative body only makes sense in an avowedly Hindu state; in a sense, therefore, the Hindu Marriage Act constitutes an admission by Jawaharlal Nehru that ultimately India is a Hindu state.
India was a demography of many kingdoms till unified as a federal Nation as India. It had originated many faiths and many philosophies. Ajivika, Chauvaka, Buddhism, Jainism were the major opposer of Brahmanism/Vedism/Polytheist idolism priesthood for pagan deities with Vedic pursha shukta philosophy. Brahmanism was the major evil faith ever in this land but politicians of federal nations were major followers of Brahmanism. They put all faiths originated in this land in a single umbrella named “Hindu” which is not only stupidity but also it shows height of their nonsense and idiocy with foolishness. It was crookedly and intentionally made to promote vedic purusha shukta in our federal governance to promote Vedism. Its the reason why Brahmin, Kshatriya and Vaishya represented as General caste and Shudra as OBC and Atishudra as Sc & ST. Being only 14% of the Indian population as General caste enjoy 50.5% of reservation i.e. 50.5% seats in government reserved for general category and rest for lower caste origin i.e. 86% of Indian population enjoy only 49.5% as reserved for other non-General category.
See these Maps you can’t find any single place named “Bharat”
More than 99.99% Muslims of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh doesn’t know about their origin. Most of them thinks they are belongs to out of their countries because Islam is a foreign religion; where truth is more than 97% of Muslims of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh are root natives to their own land and their linguistic race; where only 3% or even less than even 3% Muslims are from other origins, but not majorly from Arabic origin. Islamic Invaders those invaded India like Persians, Afghans and Turko-mongols once upon a time had practicing some other faiths before conversion to Islam and Invading to Indian Demography. Islamic invasion majorly happened in 700AD its because Prophet Muhammad born in 570AD and reveled his faith Islam in his forties i.e. in 609/610AD and got died in 632AD, so after 610AD his followers embraced the Islam and propagated to other land. When Islam came to our Indian demography in that time Brahmanism was the major religion, because Buddhism and other major faiths like Ajivika, Charuvaka, Lokayata etc. etc. had been destroyed by Vedic promoters after 185 BC and after wards. Many kingdoms had been converted to Vedic caste systems its the reason why major population from different linguistic Kingdoms had converted to Shudra castes those had been exploited by Vedic upper castes due to their Brahmin’s code of Manusmriti. When Islam came to Indian demography they forcefully converted many root natives to Islam irrespective what they were practicing in that time. When Shudra got a better faith than even Vedism/Brahmanism many lower castes even converted themselves in to Islam; it does not mean Brahmans, Viashyas and Kshatriyas had not converted in that time. Islamic Invaders amalgamated to root natives of India and lost their origin identity but their embraced art of living style i.e. Islam became a major part of Indian race. Here everybody must remember that the founder of Islam Prophet Muhammad was a non Muslim or polytheist believer till his forties i.e. he lived as a non Muslim for 40 years and rest 22 years as Muslim. Anybody can study what he did in his 40 years and rest 22 years. His non-Muslim life was more better than his rest 22 years life as he lived as an identity of violence and sins. When his faith came to India our root natives embraced the faith only due to Vedic persecution of caste system by upper castes. So the Muslims we see in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh majorly our root natives those had converted to Islam due to faiths persecutions. Muslims of different states are only the root natives of that State or linguistic race i.e. Muslims seen in Gujarat are belongs to Gujarati linguistic clans those had converted to Islam after 700AD. Like this the Muslims seen in our different states are originally belongs to that States or linguistic race excluding interstates migrations. Andra Muslims are from Telugu linguist clans, Maharashtra Muslims are belongs to Marathi linguist clan, so on and so forth. They changed their mother tongues as Urdu due to maintaining uniformity of community in Indian Muslims. Urdu is an Indian language whose 99% verbs are from Nagari language. Muslims of different States of India were root natives to their land its the reason why they could not leave their root native land even after partition its because they didn’t have any relatives out of their root natives, but evil dirty politicians forced them to leave their own land due to their dirty political hegemony. India got divided by few politicians according to their selfish desires on the basis of major religions Hindu and Muslim for their political mileage, organized benefits and racial hegemony. The consents of the root natives had not taken in to considerations or had their plebiscites for division. Few hegemonic crazy politicians decided what will be the name of our country, National anthem and song etc. etc. according to their favor; Is not it political gundaism in the democracy by so called self claimed politicians of majority?
(Download this video from YouTube because some knaves criminals trying to stop promoting & spreading the truth of this video. They banned the previous video calming copyright infringement. lol If Osho had said it for social reformation and had exposed the truths about Brahmins then why it should be banned? Thousands and thousands of Osho videos are published on YouTube without the Osho international they are not violating copyright infringement but only this video violates copyright infringement which they ban often. lol If preliminarily they had intention to ban this video, then we would not have this video on public domain. The ban would have been due to suppression by Vedic promoters/Brahmins or by their undue influences or by bribe to some stupid & Idiots Osho International employees those do not want to promote this video. Stupids, idiots and criminals resides everywhere in controlling positions those do not wants to be exposed )
राह्मणतो वेदका गुलाम है; लेकिन जो जातिबाद यानि पुरुष शुक्त को मानता है ओ ब्रह्मणोंका का गुलाम है | क्षैत्रिय भी गुलाम, बैश्य भी गुलाम और सूद्र इन सबकी गुलाम | बेदका पुरुष शुक्त हमें गुलाम बनानेका धूर्तोंका बनायाहुआ फंदा है |
Those believe in Caste system or Purusha Sukta they are all slave to Brahmins. When you worship delusional idols of Brahmins like Ganesh, Shiva-linga, Narsimha, Hanuman etc. etc. then you admits you are submitting yourself to lies, deception, illusions or delusions, discrimination, irrationality, blind beliefs and antisocial world of Brahmins and to their hegemony or Brahmins as your BOSS.